The purpose of the Negotiation Class is to create a cohesive group of cities and counties to negotiate Classwide settlements, on a voluntary basis, with Defendants who make, distribute, or sell opioids nationwide. Class Representatives and Class Counsel will represent the Negotiation Class. Class Members will vote on any Class settlement proposal. If 75% of those Class Members who vote (as described in FAQ 18 and 19) support a proposed Settlement, Class Counsel will ask the Court to approve it. The ultimate purpose of the Negotiation Class is to make settlement easier to obtain.Back To Top
Yes. This is a new use of the Class action mechanism under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, reflecting the unique nature of the national opioids litigation. Unlike any mass litigation before, thousands of cities and counties nationwide are pursuing claims against major defendants. The goal is to recover money to help fight the opioids epidemic, provide prevention and treatment services going forward, and change Defendants’ practices.Back To Top
Joining all cities and counties together as a Negotiation Class gives them maximum negotiating power, makes the negotiation of comprehensive settlements a more practical process, enables Defendants to know the group with which they are negotiating, and enables Class Members to vote on resulting settlement offers.Back To Top
The Court has authorized the following 49 counties and cities to serve as the Negotiation Class’s Class Representatives: (1) County of Albany, New York; (2) City of Atlanta, Georgia; (3) Bergen County, New Jersey; (4) City of Baton Rouge/East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana; (5) Broward County, Florida; (6) Camden County, New Jersey; (7) Cass County, North Dakota; (8) City of Chicago, Illinois; (9) Cobb County, Georgia; (10) City of Concord, New Hampshire; (11) Cumberland County, Maine; (12) City of Delray Beach, Florida; (13) Denver, Colorado; (14) Escambia County, Florida; (15) Essex County, New Jersey; (16) County of Fannin, Georgia; (17) Franklin County, Ohio; (18) Galveston County, Texas; (19) County of Gooding, Idaho; (20) City of Grand Forks, North Dakota; (21) County of Hennepin, Minnesota; (22) City of Indianapolis, Indiana; (23) County of Jefferson, Alabama; (24) Jefferson County/City of Louisville, Kentucky; (25) Jersey City, New Jersey; (26) Kanawha County, West Virginia; (27) King County, Washington; (28) City of Lakewood, Ohio; (29) City of Los Angeles, California; (30) City of Lowell, Massachusetts; (31) City of Manchester, New Hampshire; (32) Maricopa County, Arizona; (33) Mecklenburg County, North Carolina; (34) The Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee; (35) Milwaukee County, Wisconsin; (36) Monterey County, California; (37) City of Norwalk, Connecticut; (38) County of Palm Beach, Florida; (39) Paterson City, New Jersey; (40) City of Phoenix, Arizona; (41) Prince George’s County, Maryland; (42) Riverside County, California; (43) City of Saint Paul, Minnesota; (44) City of Roanoke, Virginia; (45) County of Rockland, New York; (46) City and County of San Francisco, California; (47) County of Smith, Texas; (48) County of Tulsa, Oklahoma; and (49) Wayne County, Michigan.Back To Top
The Court has authorized the Negotiation Class to negotiate with 13 Defendants (including their affiliates): (1) Purdue, (2) Cephalon, (3) Endo, (4) Mallinckrodt, (5) Actavis, (6) Janssen, (7) McKesson, (8) Cardinal, (9) AmerisourceBergen, (10) CVS Rx Services, Inc., (11) Rite-Aid Corporation, (12) Walgreens, and (13) Wal-Mart. The Negotiation Class is authorized to negotiate settlements with any of these 13 Defendants, on any of the claims or issues identified below in FAQ 7, or other claims or issues arising out of the same factual predicate. If Class Counsel seek to negotiate for the Class with any other defendants, they can file a motion asking the Court to amend the Class certification order.Back To Top
No. No Class settlement has been reached yet with any Defendant. But the existence of a Negotiation Class makes the possibility of Class settlement more feasible because a Defendant will know the group with which it is negotiating. There is no guarantee, however, that there will be a Class settlement and it is possible that there will be settlements that do not encompass the Class, such as settlements between one or more Class Members and one or more Defendants.Back To Top
In this Negotiation Class, the Court certified two federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) claims and two federal Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”) issues. The RICO claims and the issues related to the CSA are similar across the country and the Class. The first RICO claim alleges that five Defendants misled physicians and the public about the need for and addictiveness of prescription opioids, all in an effort to increase sales. The second RICO claim alleges that eight Defendants ignored their responsibilities to report and halt suspicious opioid sales, all in an effort to artificially sustain and increase federally-set limits (quotas) on opioid sales. The CSA issues allege that the CSA required Defendants to create systems to identify, suspend, and report unlawful opioid sales, and that Defendants failed to meet those obligations. As noted in FAQ 5, above, the Negotiation Class is authorized to negotiate Class settlements concerning these claims and issues or other claims or issues arising out of the same factual predicate. However, this Negotiation Class does not involve claims by State governments against the Defendants and no Class settlement will release or otherwise interfere with any State government’s current or future litigation. This Negotiation Class concerns claims only of counties and cities. You can read more about these claims and issues in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion certifying this Class, which is posted here.Back To Top
No. The Court has not decided any Classwide claims or defenses on the merits and the Court will not render any Classwide decisions on the merits of any claims asserted by the Class or individual Members of it. By establishing this Negotiation Class and issuing the notice, the Court is not suggesting the Class would win or lose this case. This Class has been certified for negotiation purposes only.Back To Top
The Negotiation Class is defined as:
All counties, parishes, and boroughs (collectively, “counties”); and all incorporated places, including without limitation cities, towns, townships, villages, and municipalities (collectively “cities”).
A complete current list of Class Members is available here. The list may be updated as the Court may order.
The terms “counties” and “cities” are used only as shorthand. The Class includes political subdivisions with other names, such as parishes, villages, towns, townships, etc. The list of Class Members was devised primarily from the U.S. Census Bureau lists of governmental entities that provide services to their residents. Check the Cities and Counties lists posted here to confirm whether you are a Negotiation Class Member.Back To Top
Yes. Counties and cities that sue in state court are Members of this Negotiation Class, with the option to opt out. However, nothing about Membership in the Negotiation Class interferes with the rights of any federal or state court plaintiffs to proceed with their own cases for litigation, trial, or individual settlement. Only if and when a Class settlement has been reached, has been approved by 75% of the voting Class Members as described in FAQ 19, and has been approved by the Court, would Class Members lose their ability to proceed on their own, in exchange for the settlement benefits that they would receive.Back To Top
The Court’s certification of the Negotiation Class does not automatically end or immediately affect any opioid suit that a Class Member has filed, whether in federal or state court. Therefore, your county or city does NOT need to opt out of the Class in order to prosecute, try, or settle its own case against one or more Defendants. By remaining in the Class, however, your county or city does risk dismissal of its own lawsuit (or loss of the right to file one if it hasn’t already done so) against a settling Defendant if a Class settlement is reached and approved prior to your county or city obtaining any relief (at trial or through a non-class settlement) on its own (although you would obtain money from the Class settlement).
Specifically, under the Court’s Order certifying the Negotiation Class (see paragraph 13 of the Order), even if you remain a member of the Negotiation Class, you do NOT give up your right to file or prosecute your individual suit, including taking the case all the way through trial and verdict, or negotiating your own settlement against one or more Defendants. The filing of complaints and motions, pursuit of pretrial discovery, pretrial hearings, trials, and individual settlements prior to the approval of any Class settlement are NOT affected by membership in the Negotiation Class. Again, this applies to cases in both federal and state court.
Importantly, even if your county or city obtains a judgment against one or more of the 13 Defendants or it reaches a settlement with one or more of them, it will still remain a Class Member with respect to all of the other Defendants. Therefore, if your county or city accepts and collects on a judgment or a settlement with a particular Defendant before there is a final, approved Class settlement with that Defendant, your county or city will not automatically be entitled to receive additional compensation with respect to that Defendant through the Class settlement (but it will be bound by any Class settlement to the extent the Class settlement settles claims against other Defendants). Similarly, if a county or city has a case against a particular Defendant that goes to trial and a verdict is returned in favor of that Defendant, your county or city won’t automatically be entitled to share in any Class-approved and Court-approved settlement that the Class may later reach with that same Defendant (but it will be bound by any Class settlement to the extent the Class settlement settles claims against other Defendants).
The underlying presumption is that Class members should not be able to obtain double-recoveries under their own settlements/judgments and under a Class settlement. Thus, while it is possible that a Class settlement could be reached that will allow Class members who have obtained individual settlements or gone to verdict at trial to participate in a Class settlement to some extent (such as by giving up rights under individual settlements or judgments), it also is possible that, once a Class member has obtained an individual settlement with, or gone to verdict in a trial against, one or more Defendants, those Defendants will not agree to allow the Class member to participate in the Class settlement fully or at all.
Because there are many ways that individual settlements/verdicts might interact or overlap with a Class settlement, the Court has reserved authority to determine in the context of actual situations whether Class members with prior judgments or settlements should be precluded from participation in any particular Class settlement. The Court will presume that, once a county or city has collected on an individual settlement or judgment with respect to a Defendant, that county or city cannot also participate in any Class settlement fund with respect to the same Defendant. However, the Court will allow a county or city to make an application (with notice to the Class Representatives, Class Counsel, and relevant Defendant(s)) to overcome the presumption by demonstrating good cause in particular circumstances.
Example 1: County A has a case against Defendant X, an opioids manufacturer, that goes to trial and it obtains a judgment against Defendant X. County A will be allowed to collect on its judgment against Defendant X, but not to also share in any settlement that the Class negotiates with Defendant X (unless County A gives up its judgment). County A, however, will still remain a Class Member and will be entitled to share in a settlement that the Class later reaches with Defendant Y, an opioids distributor, or Defendants other than Defendant X.
Example 2: County B has a case Defendant Y, an opioids distributor, that goes to trial and a verdict is returned in favor of Defendant Y. County B will not be allowed to share in any settlement that the Class negotiates with Defendant Y. County B, however, will still remain a Class Member and will be entitled to share in settlements that the Class later reaches with Defendant Z, a pharmacy, or Defendants other than Defendant Y.
Example 3: County C has a case against Defendant X, an opioids manufacturer, that it settles. The Class later reaches a settlement with Defendant X, as well as with Defendant Y, an opioids distributor, and with Defendant Z, a pharmacy. Unless Defendant X agrees to void the settlement with County C, County C will not be allowed to share in the settlement that the Class reaches with Defendant X, but it will be allowed to keep what it received under its individual settlement, and it will be allowed to share in the settlement that the Class negotiates with Defendants Y and Z.
On October 4, 2019, Judge Polster issued an order specifically confirming that a county or city can participate in the Negotiation Class without giving up any right to contest federal court jurisdiction over that county or city’s claims concerning the Opioid epidemic. For example, if your county or city filed a lawsuit in state court and that lawsuit was removed to federal court, your county or city may participate in the Negotiation Class and still argue that its lawsuit should be remanded to state court. As a separate issue, however, if your county or city participates in the Negotiation Class, it will be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio (Judge Polster) with respect to matters pertinent to the Negotiation Class itself.
The Negotiation Class does not directly affect the litigation or settlement of the claims of other types of plaintiffs, such as Indian Tribes, third party payors, and others, that are proceeding in federal or state courts. These plaintiffs can organize themselves as groups or propose their own Classes, for trial or settlement purposes.Back To Top
The creation of the Negotiation Class has these next steps:
All Negotiation Class Members will be given advance notice of any Class settlement offer, including details on its terms and conditions, and they will have an opportunity to vote on each settlement offer. Class Members will be able to cast their vote securely, through this website, which will establish a voting identity and portal for each Class Member. Only Class settlements achieving 75% approval votes, by number, by allocation, and by population, of the litigating and non-litigating Class Members that vote (as described in FAQ 19) will be submitted to the Court, which will make the final determination of whether to approve the settlement.Back To Top
Yes. If there is a proposed settlement that is approved by 75% of the voting Class Members, as described in FAQ 18 and 19, the Court will review and decide whether to approve it, under the Class action settlement approval process set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e). Generally, the Court will assess whether any settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. All applications for fees and costs also require court approval under Rule 23 procedures. (See https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_23.)Back To Top
Yes. As a Negotiation Class Member, you will be entitled under Rule 23(e) to object to any settlement, even if it has received approval from the Class. However, as described in FAQ 27, you will likely not be able to exclude yourself from the Class at that time. An objection explains your concerns to the Court for its consideration but does not remove you from the Class.Back To Top
The Negotiation Class will last for 5 years from the date it is certified by the Court. The Court certified the Class on September 11, 2019 and the Negotiation Class will last until September 11, 2024. After that date, the Class will not exist as an entity with which a Defendant can negotiate. However, the Negotiation Class will continue to exist with regard to: (1) any Class settlements presented to the Negotiation Class for a vote before that date, to carry out the voting and approval process; and (2) any Class settlements reached before that date, to complete settlement administration and enforcement.Back To Top
Each Class Member will vote only once on any particular Class settlement proposal. The vote will simply be yes-or-no, in favor of or against the proposed settlement. Class Members that do not vote will not be counted as either yes or no votes; as with an election for government office in the United States, the only votes that are counted are those of the voters who actually cast votes. Class Members’ votes will be tabulated mechanically within each applicable voting pool, to make sure that 75% of each pool is in favor of the proposed settlement before it is presented to the Court. The voting pools are described in FAQ 19. Voting tabulation does not require any effort by the Class Members. The requirement of 75% support of voting Class Members across the different voting pools ensures that no settlement will go forward without a wide cross-section of support from cities and counties of all sizes and interests.Back To Top
The agreement to be bound by a supermajority vote means that no settlement can be reached that would bind the Negotiation Class without the approval of 75% of the voting Class Members, defined in several ways. To be binding, 75% of those voting in each of the following six categories must approve a proposed settlement:
For purposes of counting votes, only votes cast will be considered. In order for a proposed settlement to be binding on the Negotiation Class, 75% of those Class Members who cast votes in each of these six categories must be in favor. No settlement will be submitted to the Court for final approval unless 75% of those voting in each of the six categories are in favor. No county or city that is not a Class Member as of the deadline for a vote on a proposal will be allowed to vote on that proposal.Back To Top
Any Class settlement funds will be distributed in three steps:
Step 1: Each county’s share of the settlement will be distributed in accordance with an “allocation model.” The allocation model uses three factors, based on reliable, detailed, and objective national data, to determine the share of a settlement fund that each county will receive. These factors address the most critical causes and effects of the opioid crisis and are weighted equally (1/3-1/3-1/3): (1) the amount of opioids shipped to the county adjusted as described below; (2) the number of opioid deaths that occurred in that county; and (3) the number of people who suffer opioid use disorder in that county. The amount of opioids shipped to a county is adjusted based on opioid use disorder prevalence or the rate of opioid-involved deaths in the county, whichever is worse relative to national averages. The model makes this adjustment because the oversupply of opioids had more deleterious effects in some counties than in others. Thus, the allocation model is designed not to favor either small or large counties based solely on population. Ultimately, the model allocates settlement funds in proportion to where the opioid crisis has caused actual harm.
Step 2: Counties and their constituent cities, towns, and boroughs may distribute the funds allocated to the county among all of the jurisdictions in any manner they choose. If the county and cities cannot agree on how to allocate the funds, the Allocation Map reflects a default allocation that will apply. The default allocation formula uses historical federal data showing how the specific county and the cities within it have made opioids-related expenditures in the past. Any of the affected jurisdictions may ask a Special Master to apply a different formula.
Step 3: If the default allocation is used and a city’s share is less than $500, then that amount will instead be distributed to the county in which the city lies to allow practical application of the abatement remedy. Affected cities could seek recovery through intra-county allocation described in Step 2, or from the Class Members’ Special Needs Fund (see FAQ 24). In the rare circumstance that a city with a share of less than $500 lies in a county that does not have a county government, the amount would instead go to the Class Members’ Special Needs Fund, and Class members could seek recovery from that Fund.
Further information about the allocation formulas and their data sources are available here.Back To Top
The Negotiation Class process does not interfere with a Defendant’s ability to settle directly with one or more States. If a Defendant reaches a settlement directly with a State, nothing about this Negotiation Class process would affect the distribution of those settlement funds between the State and its own cities or counties. The Court has explicitly ordered that the Class’s lawyers not involve themselves or the Class in the process of allocating monies secured by States between themselves and their counties and cities.Back To Top
Negotiation Class Representatives do not receive preferential treatment under any settlement simply for serving as Class Representatives. Their allocation will be calculated in precisely the same manner as every other Class Member’s. However, they can apply to the Court for reimbursement of costs and expenses incurred by reason of serving as Class Representatives. Also, courts often award a modest amount to Class Representatives, called an incentive or service award, so as to encourage Class Representatives to step forward on behalf of others. Any such awards are subject to Class notice and Court approval.Back To Top
Fifteen percent (15%) of any Class settlement fund will be put into the “Special Needs Fund.” Any Class Member may apply for a distribution from the Special Needs Fund: (1) to recover its costs of litigating its own opioids lawsuit, if that case was filed before June 14, 2019; and/or (2) to obtain additional relief for any local impact of the opioids crisis that is not captured by the Class Member’s allocation. Applications will be made to and approved by a court-appointed Special Master, on a case-by-case basis. Any unawarded amount remaining in this Special Needs Fund would revert to the Class.Back To Top
Yes. You have a one-time opportunity to exclude your county or city from the Class and you must do so before November 22, 2019. You must follow the procedure set forth in FAQ 26 below to exclude your county or city. As explained in FAQ 27, you will likely not be given a second opportunity to exclude your county or city from the Class if a settlement is later reached and you should not count on such an opportunity being available at that time.Back To Top
You may exclude your county or city (“opt out”) by signing and sending, either by email or by first-class U.S. mail, the Exclusion Request Form.
P.O. Box 6727
Portland, OR 97228-6727
The Exclusion Request Form must be signed by an authorized official or employee of the county or city itself, under penalty of perjury pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, and is subject to verification by the Court. If you exclude your county or city from the Negotiation Class, your county or city will not be bound by any Orders or Judgments regarding the Class, and it will have no right to share in any settlement reached by the Class.Back To Top
Not under the current Court Order. The Court’s Order certifying the Negotiation Class provides only one opportunity for a county or city to exclude itself from the Class. The exclusion deadline ends on November 22, 2019. If a settlement is reached and proposed to the Class for its approval, Class Members who do not support the settlement may (1) vote against it and/or, (2) if the settlement is nonetheless approved by the Class votes, file objections with the Court. Rule 23 permits a court to offer a second opportunity for Class Members to opt out when a settlement is proposed, but the Rule does not require the Court to give Class Members a second opportunity to opt out. In this case, it is anticipated that the Court will not give Class Members a second opportunity to opt out. Therefore, Class Members should not rely on that possibility. Class Members should expect that there will be no opportunity to opt out of the Class after November 22, 2019.Back To Top
The Court has authorized the following six lawyers to jointly represent the Negotiation Class: Jayne Conroy and Christopher A. Seeger are Co-Lead Negotiation Class Counsel and Gerard Stranch, Louise Renne, Mark Flessner, and Zachary Carter are Negotiation Class Counsel. Each of these six lawyers represents only cities or counties in Opioids-related litigation.Back To Top
Class Counsel will apply to the Court for approval of fees and costs under Rule 23(h). As a Class Member, you will receive notice and have an opportunity to object to any such application. The Court may appoint fee committees to make recommendations of any fee awards, to avoid duplication of payment, and to ensure appropriate compensation of those whose efforts provided a common benefit. The Court will make the final decision about all fees paid out of the Class’s recovery to any lawyer.Back To Top
The current fee agreement that a county or city has with its outside counsel remains in effect. Membership in the Negotiation Class does not change that. In the event of any settlement that achieves Class and Court approval, there would be a “Private Attorneys Fund” from which outside counsel for Class Members that had signed retainer agreements for opioid epidemic-related litigation before June 14, 2019 could apply for fees and costs in lieu of any current fee agreement. That would be a voluntary decision between the county or city and its outside counsel. A total of up to 10% (maximum) of any approved Class settlement amount will be held in the Private Attorneys Fund. Any unawarded amount remaining in this Fund would revert to the Class. The Court must approve all payments from this Fund.Back To Top
Pertinent news and information will be posted at this website, on an ongoing basis. As a Class Member, you can also sign up here for email notices alerting you to the fact that new information has been posted to this website.Back To Top
One defendant, Purdue, has declared bankruptcy. To seek relief against Purdue, your jurisdiction must file its own proof of claim with the bankruptcy court by the bar date (bar date information will be posted on this website when it becomes available). You do NOT have to opt out of the Negotiation Class to file a proof of claim in the bankruptcy court.
In other words, whether you remain in or opt out of the Negotiation Class will have no effect on your rights or obligations as a Creditor in the Purdue Bankruptcy, including any right to receive a distribution or recovery in the bankruptcy. The Negotiation Class (and any decision about whether to remain in or opt out) is not at this point connected in any way to the Purdue Chapter 11 Cases.
Negotiation Class Counsel may file and request Bankruptcy Court approval of a class proof of claim, if appropriate to facilitate recovery to the Class in connection with any settlement or plan reached in the Purdue Bankruptcy. You should not assume that any such claim, if filed, will be accepted or approved. Even if such a claim is approved, it will not change the overarching fact that the treatment of every town, city, county, municipality or similar political subdivision in Purdue’s bankruptcy will not be affected by whether such political subdivision remains in or opts out of the Negotiation Class.Back To Top